The Paris Agreement does not dare to use the words “promise” or “commitment.” It is so absurd to approve anything that can be considered too restrictive that its announcement was delayed at the last minute, because the United States insisted on replacing the word “must” with “should” with respect to the responsibility of developed countries in mitigating the effects of climate change (Article 4.4). If President Trump is re-elected, it is likely that the United States will withdraw from the agreement by the end of his second term. There is no question, however, of the United States resuming the agreement. The president recently said that he supports measures to protect the economy and that the country could imagine the Paris climate agreement if it were amended to be fairer for the United States.10 It creates more competition for innovation, which improves emissions levels. The Paris Agreement has created more ambition in provinces, states and cities around the world. There is a strong desire to accelerate measures to combat climate change. Commitments made by local communities facilitate faster securing agreements at the national level. When cities take steps to develop ideas about renewable energy, it makes our urban areas healthier and more resilient. www.climatechangenews.com/2018/07/12/countries-yet-ratify-paris-agreement/ President Trump says the Paris agreement will hurt job growth, manufacturing and industries such as coal, natural gas, steel and cement. He expressed concern that U.S. commitments were superior to those of China and India and suggested that the United States consider renegotiating the agreement. Increased temperature would reduce water supply and harvest levels. In addition, melting ice would raise sea levels, flood coastal communities and destroy thousands, if not millions, of homes.
By committing to reducing greenhouse gases, the Paris Agreement aims to prevent these ecosystem disruptions. While many countries have adopted the Paris Agreement, others are less optimistic. In 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, previously concluded by U.S. President Barack Obama. While President Trump has made his intentions clear, in accordance with Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, the United States must remain in the agreement until November 4, 2020. [3] This so-called bottom-up approach may have been necessary to reach an agreement in Paris. But it was impossible to reach an agreement in which countries are clearly held accountable.
The extravagant language of aspiration that comes from Paris cannot mask the fact that the agreement does not, for the most part, have clearly applicable obligations. The sub-2 coalition has secured local constraints to reduce emissions by 80% by 2050. The agreement covers more than 160 countries, representing $26 trillion in economic activity. This figure represents one third of the world`s GDP. unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement More than six months later, the pros and cons of the Paris Agreement are stronger than ever. So the question remains: Did the president make the right decision? The aim of the Paris Agreement is to strengthen humanity`s response to the threats of climate change. Maintain an increase in global temperature to two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the next century.